New data reveals 60% of organisations have not evaluated continuity risks across their cloud services in over a year

Databarracks reveals over 60% of organisations have not evaluated the continuity risks for their cloud services over the past year….
Digital grid lines on dark background

Share this article:

Despite sensitive data being increasingly moved to the cloud, research carried out by Databarracks reveals over 60% of organisations have not evaluated the continuity risks for their cloud services over the past year.
Recently, McAfee published findings from its Cloud Adoption and Risk Report showing 21% of organisations regularly store files in the cloud containing sensitive data. This is a 17% increase from over the past two years. The number of files with sensitive data shared in the cloud has also increased 53% year-on-year. These findings are a concern in context against research carried out by Databarracks.
From a survey of 400 IT professionals, only 40% of organisations have evaluated the continuity risks for their cloud services in the past 12 months. 17% of businesses have no plans to address this over the next 12 months. Further to this, almost a quarter (23%) of organisations admit to not having backup or recovery capabilities in place, beyond the standard default options offered by their cloud provider.
“McAfee’s research shows the increase in ‘sensitive data’ in the cloud,” said Peter Groucutt, Managing Director of Databarracks. “That data must be protected, just as it has been previously for systems held in internally managed data centres.
“In many ways cloud computing is vastly more secure and resilient but it’s worth noting that several issues do carry equal risk, regardless of whether systems are on-premises or in the cloud. There is the potential for disgruntled users intentionally deleting data. Or, the potential for hackers to gain access and do the same. Or, for malware to encrypt or delete your data. For those reasons alone, it is vital to have reliable backups in place.”
“SaaS solutions will have a level of resilience built in, but that ‘standard’ option may not be sufficient. If there is a problem with a database, you may have to recover from a backup 24 hours ago, recovering the entire database rather than an individual record. Those options often make recoveries impractical because you wouldn’t want to lose a day’s worth of work to save a single mistake. Another common issue is that deleted files are removed after a short period, as little as 30 days, which is insufficient for certain compliance requirements.
“Addressing this is simple. Firstly, find what levels of protection are included. If it isn’t enough, the Cloud Service Provider itself may have additional options that will meet your need. If those options still aren’t adequate, take matters into your own hands and setup your own additional data protection methods.
“There are a range of different options depending on the type of cloud service. For self-service public cloud providers, all the tools are available, but it’s up to you to setup backups and copies across multiple regions, back to your site or to another cloud. With SaaS services the customer doesn’t have the same level of access to the infrastructure but in most cases, you can set up your own methods to give you the level of protection you need.
www.databarracks.com

About Security Buyer

Security Buyer is the leading authority in global security content, delivering expert news, in-depth articles, exclusive interviews, and industry insights across print, digital, and event platforms. Published 10 times a year, the magazine is a trusted resource for professionals seeking updates and analysis on the latest developments in the security sector.

To submit an article, or for sponsorship opportunities, please contact our team below.

Rebecca Spayne Picture

Rebecca Spayne

Group Managing Editor

Georgina Turner Picture

Georgina Turner

Sales Manager

Afua Akoto Picture

Afua Akoto

Marketing Manager

Related News

Ai Solution of the year - securitybuyer.com

Have your say: vote for AI Solution of the Year

Voting is open for AI Solution of the Year at the Security Buyer Readers’ Awards 2026, with readers invited to select their winner
Access control of the year - securitybuyer.com

Have you voted for Access Control Solution of the Year?

Voting is open for Access Control Solution of the Year at the Security Buyer Readers’ Awards 2026, with readers invited
PaxLock Pro2 - securitybuyer.com

Paxton officially launches PaxLock Pro2

Paxton the security technology manufacturer has launched a brand-new re-engineered PaxLock which is built to protect straight
KentixONE data centre - securitybuyer.com

Data centre security with KentixONE

Prior1 develops container data centers to meet the highest security and energy efficiency standards. Their containers require
Chubbsafes - securitybuyer.com

Chubbsafes explores certified storage for jewellery and precious metals

Chubbsafes, part of Gunnebo Safe Storage, has launched a new technical discussion guide examining when certified
Mercury trends report - securitybuyer.com

New Mercury Research Finds Growing Cybersecurity Gap

2026 Trends in Access Controllers Report finds interoperability, cloud connectivity and AI are reshaping long-term controller strategies.
Chris Carroll - securitybuyer.com

Comelit-PAC Promotes Chris Carroll as Sales Director

Comelit-PAC has appointed Chris Carroll as Sales Director, following an 18 year career with the company, seeing him progress
Jason Bezuidenhout - securitybuyer.com

Zygal Appoints Jason Bezuidenhout

Zygal has appointed Jason Bezuidenhout as Chief Revenue Officer (CRO), strengthening its leadership team as the company continues
Eun-Kyung-Hong_- securitybuyer.com

How AI Manages Mixed Surveillance Workloads

Eun-Kyung Hong, HDD Product Manager at Toshiba Electronics Europe GmbH discusses AI optimisation in mixed surveillance workloads
ASSA ABLOY - securitybuyer.com

ASSA ABLOY Door Group highlights importance of BS 8214:2026

ASSA ABLOY Door Group is supporting Fire Door Safety Week 2026 by raising awareness of the latest update to BS 8214:2026
Scroll to Top